If that is the case, maybe a center tapped primary with controlled pulses on alternating legs or a ratio of positive pulses to n negative pulses may speed up the process.
Do you think this may have merit?
-Lee
| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
studleylee |
Pulse Polarity question |
Lead | |
|
I vaguely remember from the desulfator original article that some of the HF ringing was beneficial in the negative swing, ie below ground( reversed polarity )
as it helped break down the crystals.
If that is the case, maybe a center tapped primary with controlled pulses on alternating legs or a ratio of positive pulses to n negative pulses may speed up the process. Do you think this may have merit? -Lee |
|||
desulfator2 |
RE: Pulse Polarity question | ||
|
Another theory was that a negative swing would polarize the electrolyte so that the desulfation pulse would be more effective. But it would seem that this would need to occur prior to the desulfation pulse, not afterwards. So, it is unknown if the post desulfation pulse ringing has any beneficial effect regarding desulfation.
|
|||
studleylee |
Pulse Polarity question | ||
|
I'm going to try to build a big unit up this week and try some configurations. I'm going to make it flexible so that the pulse will be superimposed on
a DC charging voltage, so that
it does fast narrow pulses over the DC level and down to ground also. Similar to how the high freq and voltage of a TIG welder is added in (sometimes by using ) a series coupling transformer /reactor coil on the DC welding supply. -Lee |
|||